Thursday, July 31, 2008

Bar Exam: Day 3...Free at Last!

Now, I finally get to breathe for the first time all summer. We had four Arkansas law essays this morning: Property, Torts, Domestic Relations/Equity and Decedents' Estates.

We won't find out if we passed until September 5, but all anyone cares about at the moment is drinking and forgetting the torture we went through the last two and a half days.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Bar Exam: Day 2

Day 2 of the Arkansas Bar Examination - and most others around the country - is comprised of 200 multiple choice questions split equally into two 3-hour sessions. At the end of the day, it feels good to be finished. Remember how you felt after you took the ACT, SAT, LSAT and all those other qualifying tests? Yeah, multiply that by eleventy billion. Yeah, that's what it's like. Emotionally draining would be an understatement.

What's the plus side? We only have half a day more of this godforsaken test in the morning.

EDIT: I noticed on the Above the Law blog post about the MBE that several test takers ended up with a series of 5 Ds as answer choices toward the end of the afternoon. I had 5 Ds in a row and I can take a bit of comfort in the fact that I wasn't the only one who experienced that. Maybe it went better than I actually feel about it at this point.

Monday, July 28, 2008

1 day...

Applicable law
Formation
Terms
Performance
Remedies for unexcused performance
Excused performance
Third party issues

For anyone who took or has taken Barbri, you might recall with fondness or pure, unadulterated hatred (most likely the latter) Professor Epstein's contracts lectures...all three days of them. After those lectures, I'll never forget Armadillos From Texas Play Rap Eating Tacos, his mnemonic for analyzing contracts issues. Apparently stupid mnemonics are the way to go for memorizing points of law. It's certainly helped me out in other subjects. Another of Epstein's mnemonics was MY LEGS for applicability of the Statute of Frauds (marriage, year, land, executors, goods, suretyship)

Professor Guzman had a few mnemonics for evidence though, as I recall, his handouts called them pneumonics...to introduce evidence of prior crimes, use a MIMIC (motive, intent, absence of mistake, identity, common scheme) proposition, competency of witnesses is judged by the ROTC (recollection, observation, truthiness, communication) standard and prior similar occurences are only "slipped in" by using a DICK (dangerous condition, impossibility, causation, knowledge) exception.

In property, Professor Norvell taught us that the elements of adverse possession could be remembered using HELUVA (hostile, exclusive, lasting, uninterrupted, visible and actual). To create a joint tenancy, you must have intent to create the joint tenancy plus the four unities, TTIP (time, title, interest and possession). I wish there was some kind of mnemonic for the Rule Against Perpetuities, but that is for another post.

I tried to come up with more but I gave up after a while. Intentional torts: BAFITTC (battery, assault, false imprisonment, IIED, trespass to property, trespass to chattels and conversion). Defenses to intentional torts: CSDDNAD (consent, self-defense, defense of others, defense of property, necessity, arrest, discipline). Elements of negligence: DSBCD (duty, standard, breach, causation, damages).

OK, enough for now. I have a test tomorrow.

Saturday, July 26, 2008

3 Days...

I've decided to spend most of these last few days before the test reviewing old essay questions. So I have my MEE essay book and my Arkansas essay book with the "best answers" from previous bar exams. These are just random thoughts I've had going through them.

First, and my favorite part, is that most of the essays tend to have multiple sub-parts. So that gives me plenty of chances to screw up instead of just one or two.

Second, I've noticed that almost all of the torts questions cover negligence. Occasionally there will be an intentional tort, but only rarely. There is often also an issue with minors driving cars - bless kids doing adult activities.

Third, I've always got to be thinking about vicarious liability. If life was actually like bar exam fact patterns, no employer would ever hire another person again. The dumbest people always appear in these questions and almost always end up costing their employers in the end.

Fourth, if there is a trust question on the wills, estates and trust question, most of us are screwed. I'm glad I took decedents' estates and estate planning so I can at least stumble through a trust question. Fortunately for us, Arkansas is still so poor that trusts apparently haven't taken hold well enough to test on the bar exam.

Fifth, the elements of crimes and torts have begun to enter my dreams...I think I'm in pretty good shape for those questions (MBE and essays). Common Law Burglary = breaking + entering + the dwelling of another + at nighttime + with the intent to commit a felony (i.e. theft) therein. I'm not quite as strong when it comes to criminal procedure.

I could go on and on, but I suppose I should get back to cramming. Almost there!

Friday, July 25, 2008

4 Days...

There is ultimately only one question, often with many sub-parts, when it comes to an Evidence issue:

Is it in or is it not in?

That's what she said.

I'm beginning to hear from everyone who knows the bar is coming up next week that I'll be fine, I'll pass with flying colors, etc. The only people who have any room to talk are practicing attorneys - at least they know what we're all going through, having done it at least once in the past. I'll be heading to Little Rock on Sunday to have a late birthday dinner with the family, then Monday I check into the Peabody and it'll be game time until Thursday afternoon. Hey, at least I'll have a nice room to lock myself in for three days.

Thursday, July 24, 2008

5 days...and Happy Birthday to Me!

I'm really not sure what to think about how prepared I am for the bar exam. I worked the essays from the test given in February of this year and did really well. Which totally doesn't match up with my performance on the MBE questions yesterday. Oh well, I can't do much more than I already am.


It's quite unpleasant to hear about the great summer everyone else is having. Yes, I would like to go to the Naturals game, but I'm stuck in the fascinating world of commercial paper and secured transactions. Yeah, I'd love to play a round of golf, but I can't take 5 hours out of my study day. I'm also NOT glad to hear that everyone is going to the beach this summer! Who's jealous of everyone not taking the bar exam this summer? This guy.

On a brighter note I hit the quarter century mark today. I've got evening plans to go to Bordino's for dinner with some friends and maybe a stop by Willy D's for drinks and a song on the pianos then it's be back to the books. I know this birthday won't be anything like last year, and thank goodness for that! (I was hungover for two days last year) I've also mostly finalized my post-bar trip to Austin for a wedding (and my summer vacation) so if anyone will be around those days or you know the area, it'd be good to know what to do on the non-wedding days. I have a feeling 6th Street will come into the picture.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

6 days...and Things That Piss Me Off About the Bar Exam

Because I currently lack the intellectual capacity to come up with something original today, I'm going to repost an email I received from a friend who is taking the Washington State Bar Exam. I think it fairly sums up a lot of the frustration felt by those of us studying for the bar exam this summer.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Things that piss me off about the Bar Exam:


1. People who don't record their deeds:

Hey. Fuck face. That's a nice deed you got there. Went ahead and bought Stankacre, didya? That's awesome. Owning property is a sign of real maturity. Now, why don't you do us all a fucking favor, and go record the fucking deed.

Right. Fucking. Now.

Don't put it in a goddamn drawer. Don't go off to India for 20 years. Don't leave the deed in your will for dear cousin Victorianox. Get your fat lazy ass down to the records office, and record it before I burn your goddamn house down.


2: Wily property sellers:

Here is a suggestion to those Bill of Rights violatin' petty thug ass clowns, the Police. How about you go down to Doucheacre, and arrest the son of a bitch who sells the same house to 15 different people, over and over. Im sick of this guy getting away every time he pulls this shit, and I'm left to sort out the fucking pieces.


3: 'Known' arsonists

Here's a little tip to all the cretins that keep hiring 'known' arsonists to burn down their cheating girlfriend's house. Why is it, do you think, that he is a known arsonist, you dipshit? He's known because he has been fucking caught before. You don't know who the good arsonists are, do you! Because they have their shit together.

But no, you had to go hire Dusseldorf, or Durango, or whatever D word your fuckwit moron arsonist is named, and now he's gone and burned the wrong house, and left me with a BAR question.


4: People who back out of conspiracies.

Why don't you just stick with it and save us all some trouble, you pussy.



5. Power companies that leave an electric wire live to deter copper theft

While I appreciate your effort to rid the world of thieves stupid enough to try and steal raw copper wiring that's fucking humming and has blue arcs dancing on it, it's just gonna bite you in the ass in the end. Just let the copper go.


6. Fertile Octogenarians

I think I speak for all of us when I say........Burn the witch! Burn her! And don't use a 'known' arsonist!


7. People who use anything more complicated than Fee Simple Absolute in a will

Hey, old man. Either give Horatio your fucking interest in Scroteacre, or don't, alright? Don't condition it on him growing a mustache, or learning to play the calliope, or winning 'Dancing with the Stars.' Don't grant a springing executive interest to Zenobia if she manages to graduate from Ninja academy.

Stop making my life more complicated than it needs to be, you Narcissistic old twat, and stop trying to control your property from the grave in a vain attempt to make up for your feebleness in life.


8. House Painters

Just paint the fucking house yourself, Paulson. Trust me on this one. It's not worth it.


9. Bank Mortgages

Hi there, First National Bank of South Calizonachussettsas. I don't mean to tell you how to run your business, but allow me to impart a bit of sage wisdom.

When someone :

1) named Defaultina McBankrupstein,
2) is taking out her 17th mortgage with you,
3) on a place called Mushacre
4) so she can buy a new hat,

do NOT fucking come crying to me when the inevitable judicial foreclosure sale nets $34, a button, and some lint, all of which are devoured by the banks that are 20 miles ahead of you in creditor line.

And do not ask me whether you are a junior or senior mortgagor, or whether you debt is secured, or some other bullshit I don't understand, because the answer is always the same.

D) You are Fucked. Take it like a man.


10. Wanna-be Burglars

I am sick to death of these slackjawed melon-heads deciding at 2 a.m. that they need to borrow their neighbors wrench, and are sure he 'won't mind' if they saunter on over there in the middle of the night, crowbar the garage open, smash open his tool chest, and 'borrow it.' And then always the inevitable fucking:

Did he commit Larceny/Burglary/Robbery?Huh??? Ohhhhh, no intent!

Let him go, boys. Let the man go. So I can throw the wrench right at his goddamn teeth.

Good thing when we are really in practice we will have these special Intent Goggles©, that can magically tell us, despite every bit of evidence to the contrary, this jackass really didn't intend to commit a crime. He genuinely thought that breaking into your neighbor's house, stealing his car, taking a shit on his pool table, and sleeping with his wife were all part of the social covenants between good neighbors.

Monday, July 21, 2008

Seven days...

With just days until the bar exam, I'm going back over some of the really tough subjects, including the Rule Against Perpetuities. The text of the original rule is nearly unintelligible: No interest is good unless it must vest, if at all, not later than twenty-one years after some life in being at the creation of the interest. WTF were the British thinking when they came up with that mess? A more relevant question, perhaps, is why the hell was it later adopted into American jurisprudence?

Application of the RAP has really screwed over some attorneys in the past. The greatest problem with the rule is that the courts don't apply common sense or even reality to RAP cases. One of the more ridiculous examples is the "Fertile Octogenarian" rule, which presumes that anyone, even an octogenarian (that is, a person between 80 and 90 years of age) can parent a child, regardless of health or gender. RAP cases have resulted in many colorful examples including the "unborn widow," the "slothful executor," "the magical gravel pit," "the slaughter of the innocent" and "the war that never ends." Don't ask me what they mean - I don't know, don't care and am willing to miss any related questions on the MBE.

Fortunately, in its 2007 session, the Arkansas Legislature adopted the Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetutities which takes an easier wait-and-see approach along with application of the cy pres doctrine to take some pressure off lawyers who aren't blessed with omniscience.

Unfortunately, Arkansas courts can only apply the new RAP prospectively - meaning the crappy old RAP applies to any nonvested interests created before 2007. That means, of course, that the old RAP is fair game for testing on the bar exam this summer. While that doesn't help me out on the bar exam, I can hope that Arkansas will adopt the California approach to malpractice with regard to the old RAP. In Lucas v. Hamm, the California Supreme Court held that it was not malpractice for an attorney to not understand the Rule Against Perpetuities! That's how bad the old rule is!

Anyway, I best be getting back to Property multiple choice questions...only got 7/18 correct in that last practice set and that's not quite going to cut it on the MBE.

8 days...


So after taking some time off I think, maybe, that I'm ready to buckle down and get some quality studying done these few days I have left. I tried to study on Saturday and got a little bit done, but ended up watching Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix and several other movies. Which reminds me, by the way that on this day last year Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was released. Man am I glad it wasn't released this year. Granted, I read it in about 10 hours (after standing in line waiting for the midnight release!) but that still would have cut into some quality study time I'm sure.

So today, I think I'm going over Arkansas Criminal Law Distinctions. I feel prepared (enough) for the multi-state crim law questions (which test the common law) but there will be an Arkansas-specific crim law essay on Tuesday.

Just a few of the differences between common law and Arkansas statutory criminal law are the mental states. Common law uses specific intent, malice, general intent and strict liability. Arkansas uses purposely, knowingly, recklessly and negligently.

Homicide provisions also differ between the common law and Arkansas law. Under the common law, a defendant could be convicted of murder (the unlawful killing of another with malice aforethought), voluntary manslaughter (the heat of passion/provocation killing) or involuntary manslaughter (gross negligence causing a death or by applying the misdemeanor or non-dangerous felony murder rules). In Arkansas, a defendant can be charged with capital murder, first degree murder, second degree murder, manslaughter or negligent homicide. There are multiple definitions for each and I'm supposed to know each of them.

Another important difference is in the Arkansas rape statute. At common law, rape was "forced intercourse by a man on a woman who is not his spouse." This takes me back to a story I heard about a class some twenty years ago in which our very own Prof. Guzman asked a student whether a person could rape his spouse. The student responded: "Well, Professor, when you say 'I do,' you say 'I do' forever." Well, that was the law before logic took hold in our state and the Arkansas Supreme Court held that spousal rape was a crime.

One of my least favorite Arkansas distinctions is the so-called "Retreat Rule." Generally, before using deadly force in self-defense, a victim is required to retreat if the victim can do so safely. Retreat is not required, however, if you are in your home. Note, as the cat to the right has made plain, you may never use deadly force to protect property alone. Well, time to get back to memorizing all the wonderful definitions of crimes.

Sunday, July 20, 2008

"If..." Project - Week 2

Here's Week 2 of the "If..." project, being done by my friend at JD2.0 and his friend Nick. Only 123 more weeks to go from here!

1. If you could have lived through any war in history (without actually fighting in it), which would it be?

As a good Southern boy, I'd definitely have to pick the Civil War. I think the Civil War, along with the Revolutionary War, made the greatest impact on our country. Call it the war against slavery, the war of northern aggression, blah blah blah. In my opinion, it wasn't much different from the colonists fighting the Redcoats.

"But, when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security."

Looking back, I can't say I'm disappointed in the outcome. As economically disadvantaged as the South is now, it would be far worse as an independent Confederacy. But back to the point of the question, it would have been a very interesting time in which to live.


2. If you could eliminate any one type of insect permanently from the earth, what would you get rid of?

Gnats. All the bug spray in the world can't get rid of those little things. When I played a lot of golf back in the day, one of the golf moms had everyone dabbing vanilla extract behind their ears - some old Southern remedy I suppose. That went on for an entire summer, though I couldn't really tell that it worked.


3. If you had to eliminate a single type of animal forevermore, which would you choose?

I can't even think about spiders without shuddering. I know they're supposedly (for my grammatically challenged friends, you would say "supposably") good for pest control, but they make sprays for those pests and I choose chemicals over 8-legged creatures any day.

4. If you could have an elegant dinner alone with anyone presently alive, whether you know them or not, who would you want it to be?

As Nick noted, this question is not about a romantic dinner - an elegant dinner is entirely different. For something that special I'd have to pick Alton Brown, the Mr. Wizard/Bill Nye/Albert Einstein of the culinary world. I'd love to be able to sit with him over a 50 course (ok, I'd go for a few less I suppose) prix fixe dinner. I've heard about them on the Food Network and I'd love to hear what he would have to say about the techniques used in each course, his expert opinion on each course, and definitely the other amazing conversation I could imagine would accompany the dinner. He's by far my favorite person on the Food Network.

Saturday, July 19, 2008

10 days...


Not much I can add to that thought...

Friday, July 18, 2008

11 Days...


I'm 11 days from the bar exam, but my attempts at studying haven't been very successful the last couple of days. I decided to just take today off and try again tomorrow. And I have a wedding to go to tonight! Congrats Lea and Todd!

Thursday, July 17, 2008

12 Days...

Apparently, I need to spend another day or two on Commercial Paper and Secured Transactions...

I wish everything was as easy as the "first to file" rule. Looking at the picture, I'm glad I remember that sometimes the secured party doesn't have to file the financing statement...damn exceptions! Maybe the secured party has possession or control of the collateral. Maybe it's automatically perfected and no filing is necessary (PMSIs for example). Or maybe the secured party is still within the four month grace period if the debtor or the goods are moved to a different state. Take that, bar exam!

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Bar Exam - 13 days out

I'm 13 days from the bar exam, sitting in my favorite coffee shop, Arsaga's, studying Commercial Paper and Secured Transaction. Fascinating stuff, I know.


For the Comm'l Paper/Secured Transactions essay, I'm supposed to memorize the following:
  • 2 types of commercial paper
  • 5 parties involved in commercial paper
  • 9 elements of negotiability
  • 4 elements for the Holder in Due Course doctrine
  • 10 real defenses
  • 3 exceptions to drawee liability
  • 1 exception to an exception to drawee liability
  • 16 types of collateral in secured transactions
  • 3 steps to creating a security interest
  • 5 methods of perfection
  • 1 general rule ("first to file" prevails)
  • 10 exceptions to the general rule and a few exceptions to the exceptions
So that can't be too hard, right?

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Bar Exam - 14 days and counting


So I've got 14 days until I take the bar exam. I spent most of this morning reviewing Domestic Relations and Equity, which I feel okay about. Dom Rel covers a wide range of topics but most of it isn't that hard. If I can remember the three types of Arkansas divorce, grounds for divorce and all the property division crap I'll be fine. If there are any questions about kids, I can just BS about "best interests of the child." I really hope equity doesn't show up in the question, but just in case I'm trying to memorize the maxims of equity (one of which was asked about last summer).

This afternoon I decided to switch over and do some practice MBE questions. I did two sets of Constitutional Law and one set of Torts questions. Con Law was by far my worst subject in the practice MBE I took a couple of weeks ago so I've spent a lot of time studying that lately. I got 29 out of the 36 questions correct and got 14 of the 18 torts questions correct. Which sounds great, right? Except that, as I was working through the questions, I didn't have a damn clue if I was choosing the right answer most of the time. I see this as a problem. I just keep telling myself I only need to get two-thirds of the MBE questions right to stay on track, assuming I don't completely screw up the essays.

66.67%...sometimes it seems like such a low number and at other times feels completely unattainable.

Sunday, July 13, 2008

If... Going Slightly Off the Beaten Path (Week 1)


So I came across a blog posting by my friend Jody, at JD2.0, who has started following Nick's "If Project" at nickynax.com. The book, If...(Questions for the Game of Life), is 125 pages long with 4 questions on each page. I'd like to think I could answer the four questions every week for the next 125 weeks and I'm going to do my damnedest to make sure it happens. Maybe I'll find out something about myself along the way - that's a scary thought. As it evolves, I can see myself getting a little deeper into myself - and hopefully the questions will evolve in the same way.



1. If you were to be granted one wish, what would it be?

Man, that's a tough one. At this point in my life I'm hoping for a good job. After seven years of higher education and three years of law school loans, I find myself $60,000 in debt and needing a new car before my current POS completely falls apart. As much as I want to find a good legal job (and I have been applying for several) I suppose I could fall back on my business undergrad degree and give the business world a go. I suppose I've always thought in the back of my mind that it would be nice to end up running a company one day. It's not terribly rare. 10.8% of the S&P 500 companies have an attorney at the helm. Anyways, back to the crux of the question. I really just want a job that will let me have my own place, find and raise a dog, and have enough left over after paying the bills so I can have fun on the weekends. I'm pretty happy with my life right now - great friends, great family and no desire to be in a relationship, though some nights do get lonely now and again. The one thing that is missing is security for the future - that's something that scares the hell out of me.

2. If you could spend one whole night alone with anyone in the world who is currently alive, who would you select?

This isn't an easy question. I'm not easily impressed by people and the ones I want to spend time with the most are my friends. I suppose coming from a legal background, I would really want to spend time with Sandra Day O'Connor. She was probably the most powerful person on the Supreme Court from the late 1980s until her retirement in 2005. She never seemed to have a judicial philosophy and made her decisions on a case-by-case basis. She was accused over the years of being a conservative hack and a liberal baby killer. In reality she was a great moderate, usually falling on the side of personal liberty. It was a delicate position for her to be in, especially as the first woman to serve on the High Court. Anthony Kennedy might have taken her place in the middle but I don't think he'll ever gain a legacy of deciding the great issues like O'Connor.

3. If you could spend one whole night alone with anyone in history, who would you choose?

This was actually an easier question for me. I'd pick my Papaw over anyone else who has ever lived. He died on May 22 after a long battle with colon cancer that eventually spread to most of his gut. His obituary, written by one of my great aunts is here. He was the patriarch of the Sandage family and unofficial handyman for most of Hot Spring County, especially his hometown of Donaldson. I try not to remember the frail man who lay dying in his bed - that wasn't my Papaw. My Papaw was the storyteller and historian, a reluctant leader and an overall good man. My dad told me he took Papaw around every street in Donaldson and he had a story about every street, every house and nearly every family who had ever lived in that town. I know I didn't always realize the impact he had on his community until the funeral, when nearly 500 people crammed into an entirely too small funeral chapel to pay their respects. When I went to the Sandage Family Reunion last week, there was a piece missing that I think everyone felt. But I'm thankful for the impact he had on us and the way he touched everyone he knew.

4. If you could physically transport yourself to any place in the world at this moment, where would you go?

Too easy. Cinque Terre, Italy is where I could live forever. I visited once while on a study abroad trip. The name, literally "five lands" is a trail between five towns on the west coast of Italy. Hiking, laying on the beach, eating and drinking are some of the best parts of visiting. Each town has its own character - each also produces its own wines and olive oils! There is a trail between the towns that starts in Riomaggiore and winds north. The farther north, the more treacherous the trail. It ends in Monterosso, where a beautiful beach awaits. If I could only make one more trip abroad (God forbid I don't have more opportunities), Cinque Terre would be on the itenerary.

Saturday, July 12, 2008

Libertarianism on the Rise


Time Magazine has a great article about the rise of the Libertarian Party (and, in my opinion, the libertarian viewpoint generally). The article gives weight to the very real possibility that Bob Barr could be a spoiler in the presidential race. If he can pull in enough votes from disenchanted Republicans and conservatives, he could very well deliver the White House to Barack Obama.

Depending on your point of view, that could be a long-term disaster or it could be be a wake-up call to the Republican Party. If it serves as a wake-up call, you might see some form of Newt Gingrich's "Contract With America." Even though it's a long shot, I wouldn't be terribly disappointed to see a legitimate third party take some power away from the Dems and Repubs who have shown time and time again that they can't do anything but run things into the ground.

My favorite quote from the article:

Freedom's restoration is the magic moment when the nanny state melts away and you can see the life you were supposed to live before the tax auditors and environmental regulators and drug warriors all came to rope, brand and pen you in for life with their endless rulemaking and intrusions.
That could just be a pipe dream, but the current state of affairs in the American political scene is sad enough to give it a chance.